From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZjMP-0003kF-Ea
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:08:57 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZjMN-0003jU-4j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:08:56 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36068 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZjMM-0003jN-Qn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:08:54 -0500
Received: from server1linux.rebelnetworks.com ([66.135.44.167]:34597)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jseward@acm.org>) id 1LZjML-0000QK-Nq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:08:54 -0500
From: Julian Seward <jseward@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] PPC Haiku
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:08:46 +0100
References: <f43fc5580902170734v601c4854hc5ceb916483cda6b@mail.gmail.com>
	<DD12A888-D281-4E54-A177-8979FC45DD4F@suse.de>
	<B7B45B47-D450-4C04-9F71-1F338227F83A@vivier.eu>
In-Reply-To: <B7B45B47-D450-4C04-9F71-1F338227F83A@vivier.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200902181108.46380.jseward@acm.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Laurent Vivier <Laurent@vivier.eu>

 Ah nice, but it's not in qemu svn yet is it ? ;)
> >>
> >> No, because the previous one (r450) is 9 days old and still nobody
> >> has
> >> reported any bugs with it, so it must be perfect and there is no need
> >> to update the image. ;-)
> >
> > Can that one boot opensuse cds already? If not, feel free to take
> > this as a bug report :)
>
> openSUSE is booting well since openBIOS r448.

Almost but not completely perfect ;-)

Yes, openSUSE 11.1 boots ok.  No success with Fedora-11-Alpha, though:

  cd:0,\ppc\chrp\yaboot.conf: Unknown or corrupt filesystem
  Can't open config file

I still get a boot: prompt, but there are no images to boot.  Same problem
occurs with F10.  Is there any workaround?

This is with the image

http://fedora.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/fedora/linux/releases/test/11-Alpha/Fedora/ppc/iso/Fedora-11-Alpha-ppc-netinst.iso

J