From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LdFEM-0000Sk-Lm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:47:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LdFEK-0000SY-G8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:47:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38069 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LdFEK-0000SV-Ce for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:47:08 -0500 Received: from bart.se.axis.com ([195.60.68.10]:55565) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LdFEK-00014N-1S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:47:08 -0500 Received: from bart.se.axis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bart.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AAC6416B for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:47:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from axis.com (edgar.se.axis.com [10.93.151.1]) by bart.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCCC6415D for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:47:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:47:38 +0100 From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] How are we looking for a release? Message-ID: <20090228044738.GA4877@edgar.se.axis.com> References: <49A82489.4040604@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49A82489.4040604@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:36:09AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering what others think about cutting a new release in the next few > days. I had a few bugs (like the CVE I just posted) that I wanted to make > sure were fixed before a release but I think that will all get worked out > in a day or two. How are the other architectures looking? From what I can Hi, FWIW, Iv'e commited all CRIS critical patches so CRIS would very mucch like a new release. In fact, I get lots of questions regarding 0.9.1 bad CRIS behaviour... Thanks > tell, all PPC is now using OpenBIOS so we're okay there. > > Are there any major bug fixes that people are working on? > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori >