From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LdVrL-0006nc-Is for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:32:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LdVrK-0006mh-TV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:32:31 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48778 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LdVrK-0006mO-Nr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:32:30 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:54811) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LdVrK-0004m3-Ab for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:32:30 -0500 Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LdVrH-00067v-Bh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:32:27 +0000 Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:32:27 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] How are we looking for a release? Message-ID: <20090228203227.GK20640@shareable.org> References: <49A824ED.9070806@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49A824ED.9070806@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > I wanted to see how we look from a release perspective. For x86, I > think things are looking pretty good. There are a couple outstanding > patches that need more review (like the CVE fix) but I think we'll be > ready in a few days. Could we at least document that qcow2 has some known corruption bugs for Windows guests? -- Jamie