From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ldpuf-0005Ab-5y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:57:17 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ldpud-00056F-3f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:57:16 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47325 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ldpuc-00055l-N7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:57:14 -0500 Received: from mout4.freenet.de ([195.4.92.94]:54181) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ldpuc-0006rc-B8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:57:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:57:09 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn Message-ID: <20090301185709.60194bce@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090228213620.GA64626@saturn.kn-bremen.de> References: <20090225201550.3d3032b5@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090228171520.GA56888@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20090228201650.064c0ee4@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090228213620.GA64626@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: testing qemu svn r6636 on FreeBSD; future of qemu on FreeBSD... Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juergen Lock Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:36:20 +0100 Juergen Lock wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 08:16:50PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: {snip old stuff] > > > It is possible that you got hit by the kqemu tsc vs smp problem, i.e. > > > passing `notsc' to the guest kernel or forcing qemu onto one cpu > > > (cpuset -l 0 qemu ...) may have helped there, sorry I should have thought > > > of that earlier... > > > > > > > I just tried these suggestions (with the standard qemu-devel) and they > > don't seem to do any harm :-P > > > ..but they didn't help either? (i.e. w/o -no-acpi) > Yes it did. It boots without -no-apci and with notpc just fine. > > > > Now I'm thinking about giving the patched qemu-devel another try, since > > I've found some workarounds for booting. I'll see whether I can at least > > boot into the installed openSUSE using it. > OK, the patched qemu-devel can boot the already installed openSUSE. I tried it with and without kernel-kqemu and both worked as long as I booted with notpc. Can't explain why the installation failed, though. --- Gary Jennejohn