From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LfOYB-0001xc-Qi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:08:31 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LfOYA-0001xQ-Dy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:08:31 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43230 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LfOYA-0001xN-A3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:08:30 -0500
Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:51768)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1LfOY9-0006KK-Oo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:08:30 -0500
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 01:08:28 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: Release 0.10.0 of QEMU
Message-ID: <20090306010828.GD13735@shareable.org>
References: <49AF0832.6070606@us.ibm.com>
	<1236246500.2910.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<49B01D81.3040400@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49B01D81.3040400@codemonkey.ws>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I test on x86_64.  FWIW, this I'll merge this patch into the stable tree.

Since we have nested KVM now, can you test on x86_32 inside a VM? :-)

-- Jamie