From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LfwlI-0002Cw-0i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:40:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LfwlG-0002Af-3C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:40:19 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35920 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LfwlF-0002AT-Qn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:40:17 -0500 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:11816) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LfwlE-0007wX-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:40:17 -0500 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090307134011.BZEY4080.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:40:11 +0000 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.21.171]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090307134011.ZLCE22934.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:40:11 +0000 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lfwkx-0002dl-H3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:39:59 +0000 Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:39:59 +0000 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add and use remaining #defines for PCI device IDs Message-ID: <20090307133959.GA10109@miranda.arrow> References: <20090301170120.GA666@miranda.arrow> <49B189D6.20808@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49B189D6.20808@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:38:46PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Can you just move the ones that aren't from Linux into a separate header > file? The C99 comment makes no sense on it's own. Good idea. Or maybe move the Linux ones into a separate header? Either way, it solves the "how do I make this not look ugly" problem which caused me to resort to C99 comments in the first place... I'll submit a patch later. Cheers, -- Stuart Brady