From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LfzIN-0002UJ-ID for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:22:39 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LfzIK-0002Rm-Rz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:22:38 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37617 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LfzIK-0002RV-6w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:22:36 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:49890) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LfzIJ-00074T-U8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:22:36 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LfzIJ-0005Jz-2K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:22:35 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Use the host exit syscall for exiting (Lauro Ramos Venancio)." Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 16:22:32 +0000 References: <1236428435-28631-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <94a0d4530903070802i18ba4445p712c4d1b9f97f836@mail.gmail.com> <761ea48b0903070809g2b7a7b99t9f6fca0af1bce22@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0903070809g2b7a7b99t9f6fca0af1bce22@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903071622.32818.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Laurent Desnogues > >> No. You're just reverting an earlier (also incorrect) change. > > > > That commit introduced a regression arm-linux-user, I'm just reverting > > the change. > > > > What do you propose? Leaving arm-linux-user broken is not good. > > Paul's commit 6735 fixes at least testthread for ARM (though it doesn't > fix it from i386 and x86_64). That's because x86/x86-64 doesn't support threads/NPTL at all. Paul