From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LgmLj-0002fu-50
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:45:23 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LgmLg-0002dR-Vp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:45:22 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37043 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LgmLg-0002cp-Mz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:45:20 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:3805)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1LgmLf-0005LQ-Tg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:45:20 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1LgcQZ-0003WV-Nh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:09:43 -0400
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:06:42 +0000
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
Message-ID: <20090309100642.GD4578@redhat.com>
References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com>
	<49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> <49B3E4E8.9080700@redhat.com>
	<49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws>
Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:12:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no?
> 
> That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable 
> naming convention.  I was hoping to have the first stable release about 
> 2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW.  There's already some good stuff 
> in the stable tree.

I think 0.10.1 makes perfect sense for next stable release name.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|