From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lglnp-0000L1-5W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:10:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lglno-0000HU-AX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:10:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57180 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lglnm-0000H8-41 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:10:18 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:2685) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lglnl-0007EG-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:10:17 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgegB-000167-Kh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:33:59 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:32:53 +0000 References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm-devel > >> svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 > > Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the > > latter) > > I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion. Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases). Paul