From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lh325-0003Ar-Cm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:34:13 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lh322-0003AE-LZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:34:12 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45792 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lh322-0003AB-IM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:34:10 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:28886)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1Lh322-0000Pn-42
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:34:10 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1Lh320-0006JJ-L9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:34:09 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:34:04 +0000
References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws>
	<7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098BA4@clara.maurer-it.com>
In-Reply-To: <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098BA4@clara.maurer-it.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200903101434.05464.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>

On Monday 09 March 2009, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> I just wonder if 0.XX is a good name for a stable release. May is suggest
> to increase the major number (1.XX).

I think you're confusing stability with features and completeness.

Paul