From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LhR0b-0000xN-Q7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:17 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LhR0a-0000v6-1X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43241 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LhR0Z-0000uv-OA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:15 -0400 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:35403) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LhR0Y-0002wd-Me for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:15 -0400 Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LhR0V-0004rc-0h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:10:11 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:10:11 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH] x86: Enhanced dump of segment registers Message-ID: <20090311161010.GB18390@shareable.org> References: <49B7C31F.5030201@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49B7C31F.5030201@siemens.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jan Kiszka wrote: > FS =0000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > LDT=0000 00000000 00000000 00008200 DPL=0 LDT Both are =0000, but different descriptors - is that right? Also I'm thinking the null descriptor doesn't need to show offset and size: FS =0000 is enough? -- Jamie