From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LhpAf-0001XM-2v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:58:17 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LhpAd-0001T2-En for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:58:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34907 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LhpAd-0001Sv-CD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:58:15 -0400 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:44526) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LhpAc-0005ui-TU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:58:15 -0400 Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LhpAY-0003z9-0y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:58:10 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:58:10 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RESEND][PATCH] x86: Enhanced dump of segment registers Message-ID: <20090312175809.GE14491@shareable.org> References: <49B7C31F.5030201@siemens.com> <20090311161010.GB18390@shareable.org> <49B7E760.2090100@siemens.com> <49B91E25.20102@redhat.com> <49B922F3.1000709@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49B922F3.1000709@siemens.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jan Kiszka wrote: > I dropped any ideas to filter the output, -v2 is just a bug fix and code > refactoring. The other thing I noticed, from your example, was LDT set to a null selector but what might have been odd values in the descriptor cache for LDT. I wonder if that's correct emulation behaviour? -- Jamie