From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add specialized block driver scsi generic API
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:33:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090314143327.GA26791@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236862631-22918-2-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:57:09PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> When a scsi device is backed by a scsi generic device instead of an
> ordinary host block device, the block API is abused in a couple of annoying
> ways:
>
> - nb_sectors is negative, and specifies a byte count instead of a sector count
> - offset is ignored, since scsi-generic is essentially a packet protocol
>
> This overloading makes hacking the block layer difficult. Remove it by
> introducing a new explicit API for scsi-generic devices. The new API
> is still backed by the old implementation, but at least the users are
> insulated.
Getting rid of this is good, I found tons of issues in that area
with the I/O path exerciser I wrote last week. Hower the way the new
API is designed somewhat gets in the way of my patch series to support
Gerd's native preadv/pwritev.
One thing I wonder is why we go through the block layer at all for SG.
It is actually backed by a char device that doesn't have semantics like
a block device at all, given that it can't be seekend and is accessed
at byte granularity. We could just go directly to the native Linus
syscalls from scsi-generic.c (or a scsi-generic-linux.c if we want
some level of abstraction). I'll cook up a patch trying that once I'm
back home.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-14 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-12 12:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Remove ->bdrv_pread() internal block layer API (v2) Avi Kivity
2009-03-12 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add specialized block driver scsi generic API Avi Kivity
2009-03-14 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-03-15 13:54 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-15 14:57 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-16 17:29 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-12 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Add internal scsi generic block API Avi Kivity
2009-03-12 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Drop internal bdrv_pread()/bdrv_pwrite() APIs Avi Kivity
2009-03-12 19:57 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove ->bdrv_pread() internal block layer API (v2) Anthony Liguori
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-08 17:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Remove ->bdrv_pread() internal block layer API Avi Kivity
2009-02-08 17:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add specialized block driver scsi generic API Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090314143327.GA26791@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).