From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add specialized block driver scsi generic API
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:43:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090315144313.GA30986@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BD0892.3060604@redhat.com>
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 03:54:26PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >Hower the way the new
> >API is designed somewhat gets in the way of my patch series to support
> >Gerd's native preadv/pwritev.
> >
> >
>
> Can you point out specific issues?
The patch series (now posted) makes all aio APIs use iovecs. The
current non-iovec based SG API would require some nasty shims allocating
nested aiocbs. Or we could just make the sg aio methods fake-ioveced
which is the solution I had before your split, always adding a
one-element iovec to the scsi-generic request structure.
> Using the block layer has the advantage of common setup, statistics, and
> management. I agree that the actual data movement is horribly out of
> sync with the other format drivers.
Yeah, the setup is kinda interwinded with the block layer. I wonder
whether the device-tree ideas will help sorting that out.
Note that I eventually want to support SG_IO on cdrom devices for
burning etc at which point we need to support scsi-generic even
if another driver is attached. Note entirely sure how to handle
that yet.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-15 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-12 12:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Remove ->bdrv_pread() internal block layer API (v2) Avi Kivity
2009-03-12 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add specialized block driver scsi generic API Avi Kivity
2009-03-14 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-15 13:54 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-03-15 14:57 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-16 17:29 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-12 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Add internal scsi generic block API Avi Kivity
2009-03-12 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Drop internal bdrv_pread()/bdrv_pwrite() APIs Avi Kivity
2009-03-12 19:57 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove ->bdrv_pread() internal block layer API (v2) Anthony Liguori
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-08 17:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Remove ->bdrv_pread() internal block layer API Avi Kivity
2009-02-08 17:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add specialized block driver scsi generic API Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090315144313.GA30986@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).