From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LjCuD-00054w-Mn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:31:01 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LjCu9-00052V-2r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:31:01 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40565 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LjCu8-000522-JE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:30:56 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:51552)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1LjCu6-00052c-3P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:30:54 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id
	n2GDUqIF004232
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:30:52 +0100
Received: (from hch@localhost)
	by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id n2GDUqjR004229
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:30:52 +0100
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:30:52 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PACH] qemu-io - an I/O path exerciser
Message-ID: <20090316133051.GA4200@lst.de>
References: <20090314193346.GA3955@lst.de> <49BE518E.1060804@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49BE518E.1060804@redhat.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:18:06PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Testing aio cancellations would be a good addition to this.  
> Cancellations are very rare, and in fact are broken right now.

Yeah, I'll add that to my TODO list.