qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 1/2] qemu: sem/thread helpers
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:07:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903172307.08253.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090317174217.GA10492@amt.cnet>

On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 04:15:52PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> +
> >> +struct QemuSem {
> >> +    sem_t sema;
> >> +};
> >
> > Why aren't you using pthread_mutex_t?
>
> Because we want the thread waiting on the lock to be awakened
> once the holder releases it. This does not happen with pthread
> mutexes AFAIK.

Really? I'd be surprised if there's any difference. The whole point of a mutex 
is that it blocks until the other thread releases it.  At best it sounds like 
you're making fairly sketchy assumptions about the host OS scheduler 
heuristics.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-17 23:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-11 16:16 [Qemu-devel] [patch 0/2] RFC: separate thread for IO Marcelo Tosatti
2009-03-11 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch 1/2] qemu: sem/thread helpers Marcelo Tosatti
2009-03-11 16:33   ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-03-11 16:48   ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Brook
2009-03-11 16:56     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-11 16:58     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-03-18 18:47     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-03-15 14:15   ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 17:42     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-03-17 23:07       ` Paul Brook [this message]
2009-03-17 23:43         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-03-11 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch 2/2] qemu: separate thread for io Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200903172307.08253.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).