From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoBQt-0000ud-7r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:57:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoBQo-0000pk-AD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:57:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37689 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LoBQo-0000pK-3P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:57:14 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:54847) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LoBQn-0000eP-Dk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:57:13 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LoBQm-0000gs-BX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:57:12 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id n2U6vAIF017193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:57:10 +0200 Received: (from hch@localhost) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id n2U6vAkY017191 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:57:10 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:57:10 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] push down vector linearization to posix-aio-compat.c Message-ID: <20090330065710.GA17119@lst.de> References: <20090329195346.GA625@lst.de> <20090329195452.GC1215@lst.de> <49CFE1A6.90509@codemonkey.ws> <20090329212152.GA4498@lst.de> <49CFEBBF.4030408@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49CFEBBF.4030408@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 04:44:31PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > I assume you mean this. I've confirmed that with this fix, it now works > with win32 and vmdk on Linux. It doesn't get triggered unless you're > bouncing in block.c which won't happen unless you have a driver that > doesn't support the aio functions. That's why I couldn't reproduce it > without vmdk on Linux. Yeah, that's what I mean. But my testing includes vmdk, cow and vpc which should require the block level bouncing. Guess I just didn't manage to get free poison it fast enough. > >Will repost the whole series, the win32 aio removal and some > >recent scsi-disk commits caused a whole lot of rejects.. > > > > Just two and I've fixed them locally but I can wait for you to resubmit > if you'd like. Three including the fix above. But if you can commit them directly that makes it easier for me.