qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Document Qemu coding style
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:43:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090330214321.GP3795@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D12392.6040107@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:54:58PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>  +4. Block structure
>>>  +
>>>  +Every indented statement is braced; even if the block contains just one
>>>  +statement.
>>>     
>>
>> I'd remove this, braces are not used consistently for one statement blocks.
>>
>>   
>
> While that's true, I'd like to keep this.  I found (after initially  
> being annoyed by this; I dislike punctuation) that it's nice not to need  
> to rebrace after adding or removing lines.

I hate having to add braces to add a printf when debuging something.
If you forget the braces, you change the meaning of the code.  To me
that's a disaster and enough reason that leaving out braces should
be banned.  Code style that encourages creation of bugs is bad style.
Surprisingly many code styles don't get this however.

I also like consistency, and since you need braces for multiline
statements, why not always use them?

-- 
Len Sorensen

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-30 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-29 21:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Document Qemu coding style Avi Kivity
2009-03-30  1:15 ` malc
2009-03-30 18:28 ` Blue Swirl
2009-03-30 19:02   ` M. Warner Losh
2009-03-30 19:55     ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-30 19:54   ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-30 21:43     ` Lennart Sorensen [this message]
2009-03-30 22:15       ` M. Warner Losh
2009-03-30 23:38         ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-03-31  0:09           ` M. Warner Losh
2009-03-31  5:59           ` Laurent Desnogues
2009-03-31 12:58             ` David Turner
2009-03-31 13:31               ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-31 21:18                 ` David Turner
2009-03-31 16:18               ` Blue Swirl
2009-03-31 21:48                 ` David Turner
2009-03-31 22:38                   ` malc
2009-03-31 23:28                     ` David Turner
2009-03-31 23:49                       ` malc
2009-04-01  0:25                         ` David Turner
2009-04-01  1:02                           ` malc
2009-04-01  9:04               ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-03-30 19:58   ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-30 20:10     ` Glauber Costa
2009-03-30 20:35       ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-30 20:37         ` Glauber Costa
2009-03-30 20:20   ` Andreas Färber
2009-03-30 21:45   ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-03-30 22:16     ` M. Warner Losh
2009-03-31  5:42     ` Gleb Natapov
2009-03-31 13:47 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-01  8:51 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-04-01  9:04   ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090330214321.GP3795@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
    --to=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).