From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LomUr-0008HR-44
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:31:53 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LomUl-0008G2-28
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:31:51 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35542 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LomUk-0008Fz-Sg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:31:46 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:39600)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1LomUk-0007wC-K0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:31:46 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1LomUj-0002Cq-Mu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:31:46 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/17] linux-user patches in maemo
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:31:42 +0000
References: <cover.1238531008.git.riku.voipio@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1238531008.git.riku.voipio@iki.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200903312331.43023.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: riku.voipio@iki.fi

> This some of the more cleaner linux-user patches maemo version
> of qemu carries. The idea was to setup a "linux-user-for-upstream"
> branch to git.maemo.org, but unfortunately the server is refusink
> my git pushes ATM.

These patches don't seem particularly coherent.
Some of them actually depend on preceding patches, others implement completely 
independent features.
In some places you modify code, only to change that code again in a later 
patch. For example patch #7 appears to be purely a fix for bugs introduced by 
patch #5

Paul