From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lpfga-00037e-OG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:27:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpfgU-00037K-Ub for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:27:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32822 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LpfgU-00037H-Me for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:27:34 -0400 Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.7.73]:61762) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LpfgU-0007sW-CA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:27:34 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-disposition: inline Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Received: from ironport-out-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.40]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0KHI00AL7Q9UAH10@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:27:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pc42.xtal.RWTH-Aachen.DE (pc42.xtal.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.40.42]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/1) with ESMTP id n339RQER017192 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:27:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Jan Marten Simons Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Remove -s flag in Makefile Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:27:25 +0200 References: <1238006714-27209-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <20090325.142621.-805849625.imp@bsdimp.com> <49CA97D8.5020009@codemonkey.ws> In-reply-to: <49CA97D8.5020009@codemonkey.ws> Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: <200904031127.25845.marten@xtal.rwth-aachen.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am Mittwoch, 25. M=E4rz 2009 21:45:12 schrieb Anthony Liguori: > M. Warner Losh wrote: > > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > : Is it not common standard to install stripped binaries? If it is not, > > : where is it documented? > > > > It is standard. > > Does anyone know what the various ports packages do? If everyone is > modifying the Makefile to not strip by default (and they are stripping > on install), then I think we ought to do the same. If you're installing > from source, chances are you'd prefer the executable to have debug symbol= s. Gentoo's portage per default strips all binaries on install step unless you= =20 specify FEATURES=3D"nostrip". So there the package management system (=3Dpo= rtage)=20 is in charge of stripping the binaries. Portage even warns about pre-stiped= =20 binaries. I think the default should be to let the binaries unstripped unless the use= r=20 explicitly wants to do this during install. With regards, Jan