From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpkNS-0004ir-Jx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:28:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpkNO-0004if-L6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:28:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58570 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LpkNO-0004ic-I5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:28:10 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:57666) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LpkNO-0006Ht-8L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:28:10 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LpkNN-0000ff-Bb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:28:09 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Introduce module API to QEMU Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:28:06 +0000 References: <1238724755-15929-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <200904031409.32792.paul@codesourcery.com> <49D61924.3080803@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <49D61924.3080803@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904031528.07061.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > > Hmm, this raises annother issue - we've got to be extremely careful about > > ordering. It's not inconcievable that the PCI support code would have > > constructors (e.g. to register a PCI bus type). > > Looks like constructor/destructor has explicit support for ordering. Neat. IIRC that's not supported on all targets though. Paul