From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lrc3O-0008FJ-1N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:59:14 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lrc3I-00083N-Tj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:59:13 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56310 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lrc3I-000833-Nx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:59:08 -0400
Received: from bsdimp.com ([199.45.160.85]:63132 helo=harmony.bsdimp.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <imp@bsdimp.com>) id 1Lrc3I-0005JB-4F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:59:08 -0400
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:57:46 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20090408.115746.1226244284.imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: start qemu failed with --enable-kvm -vga std
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80904081044u60ba9a4dqd6b833eb0738503@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5d6222a80904081025j1644b6bay17d1ff942247971@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090408.113954.-1962672847.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<5d6222a80904081044u60ba9a4dqd6b833eb0738503@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: glommer@gmail.com
Cc: glommer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

In message: <5d6222a80904081044u60ba9a4dqd6b833eb0738503@mail.gmail.com=
>
            Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> writes:
: On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:39 PM, M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote=
:
: > In message: <5d6222a80904081025j1644b6bay17d1ff942247971@mail.gmail=
.com>
: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> writes:
: > : In all seriousness, no matter how good your series for improving =
kvm
: > : registration
: > : are, it is unlikely to hit the stable branch. So I believe a good=
 deal
: > : would have something
: > : on the line of this patch applied to stable, leaving unstable as =
is,
: > : until we can find a better
: > : solution.
: >
: > Huh? =A0It is unlikely to be merged into stable, so let's commit it=
 to
: > stable?
: Yes. It is a kohan, and whenever you understand it, you'll reach
: enlightment. So I won't
: explain that to you ;-)

I am the tree that falls in the forrest, if I'm deaf, do I still make
a sound?

: I meant that Jan's forthcoming series that heavily touch kvm memory
: registration (the beautiful way)
: is unlikely to get into stable. So I'd advocate applying this patch
: (the said ugly way) to stable.
: Otherwise we'll get -vga std broken for good.

OK.  That makes sense...

Warner