From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LsJMr-0007EM-GZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:14:13 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LsJMm-0007Du-CJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:14:12 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38652 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LsJMm-0007Dr-74
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:14:08 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:46539)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1LsJMl-0004gC-Oc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:14:08 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:14:03 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-io: Verify read data by patterns
Message-ID: <20090410161403.GA8452@lst.de>
References: <1239284776-2115-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
	<20090409153314.GB22492@lst.de> <200904091907.45921@kevin-wolf.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200904091907.45921@kevin-wolf.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 07:07:45PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> I considered that, but actually it's not a simple flag anymore as soon as it 
> has a parameter. Don't know, you could argue either way.

We have it that way in writev.  I don't really care too much either way,
but I do care for consistency between the individual commands.