From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lt7Ks-00066E-S2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:35:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lt7Kn-00065W-Rb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:35:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35104 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lt7Kn-00065T-Lr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:35:25 -0400 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:43798) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lt7Kn-0002B3-57 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:35:25 -0400 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090412213521.VMUA4080.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:35:21 +0100 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.22.181]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090412213520.JNAW2093.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:35:20 +0100 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lt7L7-0003BC-3J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:35:45 +0100 Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:35:45 +0100 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [7094] target-mips: don't map zero register as a TCG global Message-ID: <20090412213544.GA12200@miranda.arrow> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 06:43:20PM +0000, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > target-mips: don't map zero register as a TCG global Just wondering, would it make some small sense to initialise cpu_gpr[0] to something? For instance: TCGV_UNUSED(cpu_gpr[0]); Cheers, -- Stuart Brady