From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LtgFb-0001nY-L2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:52:23 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LtgFX-0001lu-5B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:52:23 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51235 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LtgFX-0001lp-0Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:52:19 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:48938)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1LtgFW-0007iW-1a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:52:18 -0400
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:52:15 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] qemu-io: Fix handling of
	bdrv_is_allocated() return value
Message-ID: <20090414105215.GA28302@lst.de>
References: <1239700582-5615-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1239700582-5615-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, hch@lst.de

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:16:22AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> bdrv_is_allocated() returns a boolean which indicates if the offset is
> allocated, not 0 on success and everything else is an error.

Looks good to me.