From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lu8OQ-0000Xq-R0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:55:22 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lu8OM-0000QL-5T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:55:22 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54971 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lu8OL-0000Pj-PF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:55:18 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:48075)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1Lu8OL-0001Mh-8M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:55:17 -0400
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:55:13 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] struct iovec is now universally available
Message-ID: <20090415165513.GA14504@lst.de>
References: <1239812969-8320-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<1239812969-8320-2-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<1239812969-8320-3-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1239812969-8320-3-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> struct iovec is now defined in qemu-common.h if needed, so we don't need
> the tap code to handle !defined(HAVE_IOVEC).

But is the writev system call also universally available?