From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwgtC-0007ei-38 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:09:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lwgt7-0007e5-61 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:09:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39561 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lwgt7-0007e2-0w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:09:37 -0400 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:46055) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lwgt6-0002Fg-Jj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:09:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:09:33 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Switching to git Message-ID: <20090422180932.GA11616@shareable.org> References: <49EF1A26.70007@us.ibm.com> <761ea48b0904220720h48a3c53cv9f90a3c94a31f5d5@mail.gmail.com> <49EF282C.8010602@us.ibm.com> <0240830B-5527-4567-B605-51C173C39239@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0240830B-5527-4567-B605-51C173C39239@web.de> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Cc: qemu-devel Andreas Färber wrote: > Unfortunately tools like git-send-email make me loose information > instead, by not saving the sent patches in my mail client's or IMAP > server's Sent Mail folder... This can be done. Looking briefly at git-send-email's man page, The --bcc= option (which can be put in a config file) could be used to send yourself copies on a special address ("user+git-sent@mydomain.com") which you store in your sent folder using a procmail filter or similar. That's the most versatile option - it should work with any mail system which has filtering rules. Or you could use the --smtp-server= option to send the mail via a script of your choice which stores a copy. I wouldn't be surprised if the script could just run "mutt -H" to send the mail in a usual way. -- Jamie