From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lx1WE-00042b-0s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:11:22 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lx1W9-00040e-5k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:11:21 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34698 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lx1W8-00040b-SP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:11:16 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:26770)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <froydnj@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1Lx1W8-0006ej-KC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:11:16 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <froydnj@codesourcery.com>) id 1Lx1W7-00062E-8U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:11:15 -0400
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:11:13 -0700
From: Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] linux-user: ppc signal handling
Message-ID: <20090423161113.GU22588@codesourcery.com>
References: <1240367535-20081-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com>
	<1240367535-20081-3-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0904230515140.11763@linmac.oyster.ru>
	<20090423015551.GS22588@codesourcery.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0904231843130.2144@linmac.oyster.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904231843130.2144@linmac.oyster.ru>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 06:44:39PM +0400, malc wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> > The first patch moves the cpu capability flags to a place where
> > save_user_regs and restore_user_regs can get at them.
> 
> Thing is i applied patches 2 and 3 and things just worked thus questioned
> the utility of patch 1.

I suppose this is possible, but it seems unlikely, given that patches 2
and 3 reference env->insns_flags, which is a nonexistent field if you
didn't already apply patch 1...

-Nathan