From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lx42t-0001g2-T9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:53:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lx42p-0001cy-DD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:53:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43246 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lx42p-0001cv-AM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:53:11 -0400 Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.17]:58478) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lx42o-000370-Te for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:53:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:53:08 -0400 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order Message-ID: <20090423185308.GH3795@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 06:29:47PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > Revision: 7234 > http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=7234 > Author: blueswir1 > Date: 2009-04-23 18:29:47 +0000 (Thu, 23 Apr 2009) > Log Message: > ----------- > Use a more natural order It may be more natural, but it is also less safe. After all if (0 = x) { fails compile, while if (x = 0) { compiles silently even when you didn't mean that. Some people also think month/day/year is more natural as a date format, but it is confusing and impractical to actually use. -- Len Sorensen