From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lx77f-00085o-33
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:10:23 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lx77a-00081S-KZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:10:22 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35754 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lx77a-00081P-IO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:10:18 -0400
Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:33685)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1Lx77a-0003dH-7E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:10:18 -0400
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:10:14 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [7234] Use a more natural order
Message-ID: <20090423221014.GN13326@shareable.org>
References: <E1Lx3gB-0002ko-Iq@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20090423185308.GH3795@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
	<49F0C361.5030402@web.de>
	<20090423194626.GL3795@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090423194626.GL3795@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > if (x = 0) {
> > > 
> > > compiles silently even when you didn't mean that.
> > 
> > Today gcc will warn you as well. Of course this means you have to look
> > at warnings.
> 
> True.  You can tell it off by doing if ((x = 0)) it seems.
> 
> Always safer to treat warnings as errors it seems.

If you want, you can force specific warnings to become errors in current GCC.

-- Jamie