From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM brokenness due to IO thread changes
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:21:19 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428222119.GA14775@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F76295.2010403@codemonkey.ws>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 03:09:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> this is a heads-up, maybe someone has some time to look into this over
>>>> the day: I seems like the IO thread changes caused a few regressions to
>>>> the KVM mode.
>>>>
>>>> When I keep this feature disabled, I see strange hick-ups of the event
>>>> delivery mechanism, and the guest stops once in a while for a second or
>>>> so. Attaching strace makes the whole process terminate early (looks like
>>>> it triggers a race in the signal handling). And when I enable the IO
>>>> thread, I immediately get a deadlock on qemu_global_mutex.
>>>>
>>> Yes its borked. The iothread should signal the vcpu thread whenever it
>>> wants to grab the mutex lock, because unlike kvm-userspace it does not
>>> drop the global mutex when entering guest mode (VCPU_RUN ioctl).
>>>
>>> Anthony will commit patches to fix that soon.
>>>
>>
>> Looking forward. It's far more efficient to test my infrastructure
>> changes against the KVM mode.
>>
>
> N.B. he's seeing issues with the IO thread disabled.
Jan,
Can you please provide more details on how to reproduce it? You're using
-nographic?
All I see, with ping -c 0.1, is an eventual ~= 25ms in response time:
64 bytes from 192.168.122.140: icmp_seq=80 ttl=64 time=0.008 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.122.140: icmp_seq=81 ttl=64 time=0.008 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.122.140: icmp_seq=82 ttl=64 time=0.008 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.122.140: icmp_seq=83 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.122.140: icmp_seq=84 ttl=64 time=0.008 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.122.140: icmp_seq=85 ttl=64 time=0.008 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.122.140: icmp_seq=86 ttl=64 time=0.009 ms
Which is also seen before the patches.
Or even better, if you can bisect it...
> I've not seen this myself and my patch doesn't fix that problem.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 7:40 [Qemu-devel] KVM brokenness due to IO thread changes Jan Kiszka
2009-04-28 12:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-28 19:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-28 20:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-28 22:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428222119.GA14775@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).