From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lz7wW-0005gs-Ha for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:27:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lz7wR-0005fs-Vg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:27:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35799 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lz7wR-0005fl-Pv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:27:07 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:39376) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lz7wR-00018X-9g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:27:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:21:30 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: add SGI_IO passthru support Message-ID: <20090429112130.GA11241@lst.de> References: <20090427082606.GA32604@lst.de> <49F730AD.8090705@codemonkey.ws> <20090429104854.GA7846@lst.de> <200904291211.20374.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904291211.20374.paul@codesourcery.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger , Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:11:19PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > Is this actually measurably faster, or just infinitesimally faster in theory? On normal disks it's rather theoretical. On high-end SSDs and arrays the impact is noticeable, mostly due to the additional latency.