From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LzaJn-0008Fh-HX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:45:07 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LzaJi-00088m-4q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:45:06 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43242 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LzaJh-00088E-P3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:45:01 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:11188)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1LzaJh-000327-EB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:45:01 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1LzaJg-0007Lx-Rg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:45:01 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add m68k_cpu_list()
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:44:58 +0100
References: <1239743643.5808.3.camel@Quad>
In-Reply-To: <1239743643.5808.3.camel@Quad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200904301844.58524.paul@codesourcery.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Laurent Vivier <Laurent@vivier.eu>

On Tuesday 14 April 2009, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> This patch adds to m68k target the missing m68k_cpu_list():

The "m68k" prefix is bogus.

Paul