From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0zkc-0006Gs-GT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 11:06:38 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0zkW-0006DU-H5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 11:06:37 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57610 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0zkU-0006DD-Fp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 11:06:30 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:42751) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M0zkT-0006Jv-Gq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 11:06:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:06:25 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] fix asynchronous ioctls Message-ID: <20090504150625.GA9963@lst.de> References: <20090428095702.GA4710@lst.de> <49FAFF5D.7040605@codemonkey.ws> <20090501142003.GA11017@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090501142003.GA11017@lst.de> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Christoph Hellwig , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:20:04PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > 2/2 is the SG_IO passthrough which I accidentally sent as reply to the > previous version. Any reason you pulled in the SG_IO passthrough but not this patch? It's not going to work without it :) Also the commits list seems to be a lagging a little bit, can't find messages for at least the two patches you applied from me.