qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] New device API
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:52:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905060152.02351.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A0083F5.7050606@codemonkey.ws>

> > The attached patch is my attempt at a new internal API for device
> > creation in qemu.
>
> Instead of recreating constructors, I think we should just use GCC's
> constructor attribute.  This gives us ordering which will be important
> when dealing with buses.

The reason I'm not using constructors is because you have to workaround 
ordering issues. All constructors are run before main(), so there's a very 
limited amount they can actually do, and constructor priorities are not 
available on all hosts.

> I think the layering is not quite right with qdev.
>
> Not all devices fit into the parameters of register_mmio/connect_irq.
> When dealing with bus devices (like PCI devices), I think you really
> have to model the constructs that the bus expose.  Note, this starts to
> look very similar to the Linux kernel's layered device model.
> 
> For instance, the following makes sense to me (from an x86 perspective):
> <snip>

Hmm, I'll think about this a bit.

Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-06  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-05 11:31 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] New device API Paul Brook
2009-05-05 15:56 ` Blue Swirl
2009-05-05 16:17   ` Paul Brook
2009-05-05 16:26     ` Blue Swirl
2009-05-05 16:35       ` Paul Brook
2009-05-05 18:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-05 22:42   ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2009-05-06  0:52   ` Paul Brook [this message]
2009-05-06  1:04     ` Paul Brook
2009-05-06 13:35       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-09 20:55       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-09 21:06         ` Paul Brook
2009-05-10  1:34           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-09 22:52         ` malc
2009-05-10  1:35           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-10  6:50             ` Andreas Färber
2009-05-10 18:38             ` malc
2009-05-10  1:37           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-05 22:25 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2009-05-08  1:54 ` Zachary Amsden
2009-05-08 11:28   ` Paul Brook
2009-05-08 13:47   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-09  1:21     ` Zachary Amsden
2009-05-09 13:36       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-08  5:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-08 10:44   ` Paul Brook
2009-05-28 13:53   ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905060152.02351.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).