From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M1etw-0007YH-SB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 07:03:00 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M1etv-0007Xt-AH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 07:03:00 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55224 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M1etv-0007Xq-2H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 07:02:59 -0400
Received: from naru.obs2.net ([84.20.150.76]:50536)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <nchip@kos.to>) id 1M1etu-0001p9-Bs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 07:02:58 -0400
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:02:55 +0300
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: implement pipe2 syscall
Message-ID: <20090506110255.GH18405@kos.to>
References: <20090505133048.GA29646@kos.to>
	<20090505225809.GJ7574@shareable.org>
	<20090506080023.GA7230@kos.to> <4A0155F6.9000801@opensuse.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A0155F6.9000801@opensuse.org>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Martin Mohring <martin.mohring@opensuse.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Martin Mohring wrote:
> How do we want to handle if "O_CLOEXEC" is not defined on the host OS,
> because kernel too old (Debian Etch, CentOS 5)? Should it then return
> ENOSYS?

Unless you fake the uname, the glibc on the target system won't call
pipe2, and thus won't ask for O_CLOEXEC.