qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: sdbrady@ntlworld.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] suppress 'warn_unused_result' warning
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 19:53:35 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090510.195335.-1303462317.imp@bsdimp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090510221500.GA27879@miranda.arrow>

In message: <20090510221500.GA27879@miranda.arrow>
            Stuart Brady <sdbrady@ntlworld.com> writes:
: On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:15:11AM +0800, Chih-Min Chao wrote:
: > The patch add error handling to functions with 'warn_unused_result' return
: > value such as write, read, ftruncate, and realpath.
: 
: I'm slightly concerned -- read(), write() and ftruncate() can fail with
: EINTR if a signal is received at an unfortunate time, can't they?

It depends on how the signal mask for the system call is setup.

: Do we mitigate this for the most part, somehow?
: 
: Do kernels try to avoid this behaviour?  If so, under what circumstances
: might EINTR still be returned?

When a signal is received and you are waiting for data, you get
EINTR.  If there's data available, then I believe the behavior is to
return that data and not EINTR.  That's the way Unix works.

: Is it acceptable to have a wrapper around these functions that retries
: if the call fails with EINTR?
: 
: I would guess that for the most part, getting EINTR back is pretty rare,
: as there's an awful lot of code (in QEMU and in other projects) that
: doesn't check for it.

It is very rare...

: BTW, is it be possible for the write in qemu_event_increment() to
: io_thread_fd to fail with EAGAIN?  If so, aborting with perror()
: probably isn't right.

Warner

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-11  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-10 19:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] suppress 'warn_unused_result' warning Chih-Min Chao
2009-05-10 22:11 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-10 22:15 ` Stuart Brady
2009-05-10 23:19   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-11  1:53   ` M. Warner Losh [this message]
2009-05-11 15:42     ` Stuart Brady
2009-05-11 16:02       ` Paul Brook
2009-05-11 16:16       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-11 16:25         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-11 16:57           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-12 12:19             ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-11 17:02       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-11 16:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090510.195335.-1303462317.imp@bsdimp.com \
    --to=imp@bsdimp.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sdbrady@ntlworld.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).