From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: sdbrady@ntlworld.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] suppress 'warn_unused_result' warning
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 19:53:35 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090510.195335.-1303462317.imp@bsdimp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090510221500.GA27879@miranda.arrow>
In message: <20090510221500.GA27879@miranda.arrow>
Stuart Brady <sdbrady@ntlworld.com> writes:
: On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:15:11AM +0800, Chih-Min Chao wrote:
: > The patch add error handling to functions with 'warn_unused_result' return
: > value such as write, read, ftruncate, and realpath.
:
: I'm slightly concerned -- read(), write() and ftruncate() can fail with
: EINTR if a signal is received at an unfortunate time, can't they?
It depends on how the signal mask for the system call is setup.
: Do we mitigate this for the most part, somehow?
:
: Do kernels try to avoid this behaviour? If so, under what circumstances
: might EINTR still be returned?
When a signal is received and you are waiting for data, you get
EINTR. If there's data available, then I believe the behavior is to
return that data and not EINTR. That's the way Unix works.
: Is it acceptable to have a wrapper around these functions that retries
: if the call fails with EINTR?
:
: I would guess that for the most part, getting EINTR back is pretty rare,
: as there's an awful lot of code (in QEMU and in other projects) that
: doesn't check for it.
It is very rare...
: BTW, is it be possible for the write in qemu_event_increment() to
: io_thread_fd to fail with EAGAIN? If so, aborting with perror()
: probably isn't right.
Warner
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-10 19:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] suppress 'warn_unused_result' warning Chih-Min Chao
2009-05-10 22:11 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-10 22:15 ` Stuart Brady
2009-05-10 23:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-11 1:53 ` M. Warner Losh [this message]
2009-05-11 15:42 ` Stuart Brady
2009-05-11 16:02 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-11 16:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-11 16:25 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-11 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-12 12:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-11 17:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-11 16:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090510.195335.-1303462317.imp@bsdimp.com \
--to=imp@bsdimp.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sdbrady@ntlworld.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).