From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M3Yqh-0001GR-Mv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:59:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M3Yqc-0001Em-HD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:59:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42887 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M3Yqc-0001Eh-Cu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:59:26 -0400 Received: from speedy.comstyle.com ([206.51.28.2]:26222 helo=mail.comstyle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M3Yqc-0006vp-10 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:59:26 -0400 Received: from [192.168.3.33] (toronto-hs-216-138-195-228.s-ip.magma.ca [216.138.195.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: brad) by mail.comstyle.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93D7F98407 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:59:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Brad Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU TCG code does not build with OpenBSD PowerPC Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:59:06 -0400 References: <200904100821.10439.brad@comstyle.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905111259.06181.brad@comstyle.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Monday 11 May 2009 11:30:09 Blue Swirl wrote: > On 5/11/09, malc wrote: > > On Sun, 10 May 2009, Brad wrote: > > > On Sunday 10 May 2009 14:41:13 malc wrote: > > > > On Sat, 9 May 2009, Brad wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:58:06AM +0400, malc wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Brad wrote: > > > > [..snip..] > > > > > > You tested this and it works? > > > > > > Its a moot point if it "works" since QEMU 0.10.x is broken on all > > > archs we had working with 0.9.x and QEMU 0.10.x is far from building > > > as is. > > > > > > So my first priority is to get it to even build properly on the archs > > > we supported with our 0.9.x port (amd64 i386 powerpc). > > > > I see. I was under impression that Blue Swirl was building it > > successfully on (at least) OpenBSD not so long ago. How is it broken? > > QEMU works on OpenBSD/Sparc64 (at least sparc-softmmu is fine, other > targets I tested do not work well), and OpenBSD/Sparc32 did build at > some point. I had problems installing OpenBSD/i386 under QEMU, so I > haven't tested that. And that's the problem. You tested the arch no one uses with QEMU (so far) instead of what is actually being used and the 0.10.x releases still don't even build there either. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.