qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stuart Brady <sdbrady@ntlworld.com>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] suppress 'warn_unused_result' warning
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:42:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090511154226.GA29818@miranda.arrow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090510.195335.-1303462317.imp@bsdimp.com>

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 07:53:35PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> When a signal is received and you are waiting for data, you get
> EINTR.  If there's data available, then I believe the behavior is to
> return that data and not EINTR.  That's the way Unix works.

So if I do a read() from a file over NFS, and there's an awful lot of
latency (and perhaps even connection problems), and the process gets a
signal -- does that mean that the signal will only be delivered once
data is returned?

If not, then I would really start to wonder whether /all/ code dealing
with read(), write(), etc. should be written to cope with EINTR (and 
also partial reads/writes?) regardless of whatever is done with threads
and signal masks, as doing otherwise seems only to be asking for trouble
at some point.  (I'd be especially concerned about signals intended for
libraries that are not under the developer's control...)
-- 
Stuart Brady

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-11 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-10 19:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] suppress 'warn_unused_result' warning Chih-Min Chao
2009-05-10 22:11 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-10 22:15 ` Stuart Brady
2009-05-10 23:19   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-11  1:53   ` M. Warner Losh
2009-05-11 15:42     ` Stuart Brady [this message]
2009-05-11 16:02       ` Paul Brook
2009-05-11 16:16       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-11 16:25         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-11 16:57           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-12 12:19             ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-11 17:02       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-11 16:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090511154226.GA29818@miranda.arrow \
    --to=sdbrady@ntlworld.com \
    --cc=imp@bsdimp.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stuart.brady@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).