From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M5kWS-0004vv-2p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:51:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M5kWM-0004us-HF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:51:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55625 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M5kWM-0004ui-ER for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:51:34 -0400 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:48705) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M5kWM-0000Gk-3T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 13:51:34 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 18:51:26 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add GPL bios as a submodule Message-ID: <20090517175126.GA13426@shareable.org> References: <1242574141-18488-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1242574141-18488-2-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4A103084.2000508@redhat.com> <4A1031F4.4050401@us.ibm.com> <4A1039EB.4070906@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A1039EB.4070906@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Glauber Costa , Anthony Liguori , Dustin Kirkland , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alex Graf Avi Kivity wrote: > Let's only include seabios then and reject all patches to the bochs > bios. If that doesn't motivate people to switch, nothing will. Is there a technical reason why should people switch, other than you want them to? Is Bochs BIOS broken in some difficult to fix way? -- Jamie