From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M7dyR-00087T-E3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 19:16:23 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M7dyN-00083z-Oj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 19:16:23 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48585 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M7dyN-00083i-KF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 19:16:19 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:51773)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1M7dyN-0003MM-Bs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 19:16:19 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1M7dyM-00012x-4n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 19:16:18 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] New device API
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 00:16:15 +0100
References: <200905142239.18358.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<4A0D3885.1010701@redhat.com> <4A0D8801.4090402@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A0D8801.4090402@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200905230016.15288.paul@codesourcery.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

On Friday 15 May 2009, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 05/15/09 11:40, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > I think we should also have a generic BusState with a name and a list of
> > devices attached (maybe more). Then have "BusState *bus" instead of
> > "void *bus".
>
> i.e. something like the attached patch.  It is just a quick outline, far
> from being complete, and with some FIXMEs.  Compiles and works though.

I implemented something similar, plus several resulting cleanups and 
simplifications.

Paul