From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M8ITn-0003Ns-R2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 14:31:27 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M8ITi-0003LG-Vx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 14:31:27 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49280 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8ITi-0003LB-Px
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 14:31:22 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:59902)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1M8ITi-0000Zg-FQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 14:31:22 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1M8ITh-0002tK-Lm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 14:31:22 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/16] ARM Add ARM 920T identifiers
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 19:31:19 +0100
References: <20090423171503.GC4629@derik>
	<200904301708.01385.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20090523165033.GC8037@derik>
In-Reply-To: <20090523165033.GC8037@derik>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200905241931.19368.paul@codesourcery.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Vincent Sanders <vince@kyllikki.org>

On Saturday 23 May 2009, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 05:08:01PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > >      env->cp15.c0_cpuid = id;
> > >      switch (id) {
> > > +    case ARM_CPUID_ARM920T:
> > > +       break;
> >
> > This is woefully incomplete. At minimum it needs a comment describing how
> > this is a lie.
>
> I have worked out what you meant was that the copro 15 registers
> needed configuring appropriately in this case.

More fundamental than that. We emulate armv5te. The arm920t is armv4t.
i.e. even usermode code may not work right.

Paul