From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8aPs-0006ew-BB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 09:40:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8aPn-0006cf-SP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 09:40:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40828 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8aPn-0006ca-LM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 09:40:31 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:44056) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8aPm-0007Ys-Se for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 09:40:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:40:25 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Do we need CONFIG_AIO? Message-ID: <20090525134025.GA20213@lst.de> References: <20090525082151.GA4107@lst.de> <4A1A85B4.3060200@eu.citrix.com> <20090525133554.GA16351@fries.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090525133554.GA16351@fries.net> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: todd@fries.net Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Stefano Stabellini On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 08:35:55AM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote: > You seem to be under the illusion that pthreads implies AIO. I'm not just under the illusion, but in the context of qemu we do implement our own aio support using pthread. And that's exactly what CONFIG_AIO enables.