From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Fwd: Re: i8042 buffer size?]
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:09:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090525220905.GA8583@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A14300B.4000204@wpkg.org>
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 06:30:03PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> As a follow up to "i8042.c: No controller found..." thread - below are
> the scancodes which Linux receives, and a comment from a former i8042
> Linux maintainer (Vojtech Pavlik fro SuSE Labs):
>
>
>> May 20 12:25:09: 18 81 7f 18 81 7f 18 8e 53 28 00 ff 28 00
>
>> May 20 13:45:43: 09 00 00 08 00 00 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 18 fe 01 08
>
>> May 20 13:57:06: 08 7f 7b 08 7f 00 08 26 00 28 00 fc 38 fe fa 38
>
>> May 20 14:01:55: 38 ea 97 28 00 ff 28 00 ff 28 00 ff 28 00 ff 28 00 ff 28 00 ff 38 ff ff 28 00 ff 28 00 ff 28 00
>
>> May 20 14:14:35: 28 00 ff 28 00 fe 28 00 f9 38 ff f7 28 00 f8 38 fd f2 38 f7 cb 38 fe f5 38 fc e3 38 fe f2 38 fe f2 38 fe f1 38 fe f0 38 fe f1 38 fe f2 38 fe f5 38 fe f5
>
>> May 20 14:15:01: 18 f9 01 18 ff 02 08 00 02 08 00 03 18 fe 06 18 fe 07 18 fc 09 18 fd 09 18 fb 09 18 fa 0a 18 fe 0b 18 fb 08 18 fe 07 18 ff 03 08 00 01 08 00 01 08 00 01 09 00 00 08 00 00 08 00 01 28 00 fe 38 ff ff 28 00 fe 18 ff 00 28 00 ff 18 ff 00 28 00 ff 18 ff 00 09 00 00 08 00 00 18 fb 00 18 f8 00 18 f9 00 18 fe 00 18 ff 01 18 fe 01 18 f9 02 18 fe 00 09 00 00
>
>> May 20 14:20:54: 09 00 00 08 00 00 18 ff 00 18 fc 00 18 fa 00 18 f9 00
>> 18 f9 00 18 fa 00 18 f8 00 18 f7 00 18 f8 00 18 fa 00 18 fa 00 18 fa 00
>> 18 fa 00 18 fc 00 18 fc 00 18 fd 00 38 ff ff 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 18 ff 00
>> 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 18 fe 00 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 18 fe 00 18 ff 00
>> 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 08 00 01 18 ff 00 18 ff 00
>> 18 ff 01 18 ff 00 08 00 01 18 ff 00 18 fe 02 18 ff 00 18 ff 00 18 ff 01
>> 18 fd 00 18 fd 00 18 fa 00 18 f7 00 18 f7 00 18 f4 00 18 f3 00 18 ef 00
>> 18 ee 01 18 ed 03 18 ec 04 18 e9 02 08 7f 08 08 7f 00 08 44 00 09 00 00
>> 19 fc 01 08 00 00 38 81 ff 18 92 00
>
> This looks seriously like uninitialized memory (12-bit FAT perhaps?) -
> and very much like a Qemu bug. It doesn't even make sense if interpreted
> as keyboard scancodes - 00 is reserved and ff is an error condition.
Tomasz,
Can you provide a recipe on how to reproduce this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-25 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-20 16:30 [Qemu-devel] [Fwd: Re: i8042 buffer size?] Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-25 22:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2009-05-25 22:20 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-25 22:57 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-28 8:44 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-28 11:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090525220905.GA8583@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).