From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M8tP3-0002BL-GJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 05:57:01 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M8tOz-0002AA-SR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 05:57:01 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35753 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8tOz-0002A2-MW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 05:56:57 -0400
Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:41993)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1M8tOz-0005sU-BB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 05:56:57 -0400
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:56:52 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/16] ARM Add ARM 920T identifiers
Message-ID: <20090526095652.GA32352@shareable.org>
References: <20090423171503.GC4629@derik>
	<200904301708.01385.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20090523165033.GC8037@derik>
	<200905241931.19368.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20090526093944.GB4784@derik>
	<761ea48b0905260242v4290a835rd8b958c7544e667c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0905260242v4290a835rd8b958c7544e667c@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Cc: Vincent Sanders <vince@kyllikki.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Laurent Desnogues wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Vincent Sanders <vince@kyllikki.org> wrote:
> > I will post the updated patch to the list shortly. Please be assured
> > that every program we have tried (boot loaders, Linux, BSD etc.)
> > appears to function as expected, to the point it had not been
> > apparient the 920 was a different ISA version to the default emulation.
> >
> > So while this is indeed a technical issue, in practice it doesnt seem
> > to be a major problem.
> 
> It could be a major problem if you start playing with ARM/Thumb
> interworking.

I'm curious.  How would code built for ARMv4T interworking fail on an
ARMv5T emulator?

-- Jamie