From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M9eAz-00010D-Qr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 07:53:37 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M9eAu-0000yo-RF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 07:53:37 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53220 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M9eAt-0000yd-N8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 07:53:31 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:48352)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1M9eAt-0001pd-8y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 07:53:31 -0400
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:49:58 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Fwd: Re: i8042 buffer size?]
Message-ID: <20090528114958.GA11723@amt.cnet>
References: <4A14300B.4000204@wpkg.org> <20090525220905.GA8583@amt.cnet>
	<4A1B19C9.8050103@wpkg.org> <4A1B2267.80004@wpkg.org>
	<4A1E4EE1.5030707@wpkg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A1E4EE1.5030707@wpkg.org>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:44:17AM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>
>>>> Tomasz,
>>>> Can you provide a recipe on how to reproduce this?
>>>
>>> I used it with KVM, but it doesn't look KVM specific. I'll see if it  
>>> happens with "pure" Qemu.
>>
>> I just reproduced it with "pure" Qemu, no kqemu or kvm module.
>
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> Were you able to reproduce it on your system?

Tomasz,

Haven't got around to it yet, but haven't forgot either.