From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9itv-0007z9-7s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:56:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9itq-0007qg-Mg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:56:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40923 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M9itq-0007qN-9Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:56:14 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:32786) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9itp-0005KF-EI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:56:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:01:42 -0300 From: Glauber Costa Message-ID: <20090528170142.GC30777@poweredge.glommer> References: <1243523971.4046.206.camel@blaa> <4A1EADB4.2060106@us.ibm.com> <4A1EB2ED.2090901@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A1EB2ED.2090901@siemens.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Networking patches queue List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 05:51:09PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Mark McLoughlin wrote: > >> Hi Anthony, > >> > >> Recently, Jan has posted 11 networking patches and I've posted 17, so I > >> thought I'd push out a tree with these queued up. Perhaps you want to > >> pull from there? > >> > >> Some notes: > >> > >> - I've taken the first 6 of Jan's patches, but left 7-11 for now; see > >> the review comments I just posted. I expect Jan will be able to > >> fix them up fairly quickly > >> > > > > If the first 6 patches of Jan's series are ready to apply, wouldn't it > > make sense for him to submit that as a separate series? In the very > > least, I'd like an Ack from Jan before applying his series partially. > > You have the ack now. I'm very happy that Mark picks this up before it > started to bitrot too much. > > Mark, do you plan more work in this domain in the next time? I would > have no problems to route my networking related stuff through one > coordinating tree, e.g. yours. Besides getting my current queue flushed > I still have > > o rework of host_net_redir (requires coordination with Glauber) How, exactly?