From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Disable kqemu by default
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:40:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090529124044.GI29375@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090529123047.GI30777@poweredge.glommer>
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:30:47AM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:22:47PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> > Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> turns -no-kqemu option into -kqemu
> >> set kqemu_allowed to 0 by default.
> >
> > (...)
> >
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_KQEMU
> >> -DEF("no-kqemu", 0, QEMU_OPTION_no_kqemu, \
> >> - "-no-kqemu disable KQEMU kernel module usage\n")
> >> +DEF("-kqemu", 0, QEMU_OPTION_kqemu, \
> >> + "-kqemu enable KQEMU kernel module usage\n")
> >
> > Why is this change needed?
> Well, we certainly need a -kqemu option to enable it, if it is disabled by default.
>
> >
> > Even if changed, wouldn't it be better to leave the -no-kqemu option for
> > compatibility reasons? Otherwise, current scripts may break.
> options comes and go every day.
>
> but it's not a big burden, we can leave the old option around...
How about we add an option that's more future proof.
eg,
--accel qemu|kvm|kqemu|xen
if that isn't given, then it'd pick the 'best', use --accel XXX to
override the auto behaviour
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-29 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-29 12:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Disable kqemu by default Glauber Costa
2009-05-29 12:22 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-29 12:30 ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-29 12:31 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-29 13:18 ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-30 17:35 ` François Revol
2009-05-29 12:40 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2009-05-30 8:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090529124044.GI29375@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).