From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Vincent Sanders <vince@simtec.co.uk>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Add ARM920T to ARM emulation
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 00:11:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090601231115.GC28406@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906011313.49802.paul@codesourcery.com>
Paul Brook wrote:
> > I notice that ARMv4T adds the BX instruction, implying that B isn't
> > able to switch to Thumb mode although it can in later architectures (I
> > never saw the point in BX, and I guess ARM ended up the same :-)
> >
> > Is the behaviour defined to _not_ switch to Thumb when using B to an
> > address with the low order bit set, or does it trap, or is it
> > unpredictable?
>
> You need to look again at the B instruction. Hopefully then you'll realise why
> you're talking nonsense.
Ach, sorry.
My head's been buried in FDPIC, where BX is only used on ARMvT; on
everything else, LDR/LDM does the job. So I inconveniently forgot
what you cluebricked me about.
> loads into the PC either ignore(v4t) or mode switch (v5) on the low
> address bit. ALU writes to the PC always ignore the low bit in
> Thumb mode. In ARM mode the low bit is either ignored(v6) or used to
> mode switch (v7).
Thanks, it's what I've found too. from reading the 2005 ARM ARM just now.
I'll add that ARM-mode ALU writes to the PC on (v4/v4t/v5) (and loads
on v4/v4t), "bits[1:0] must be 0b00, if they are not, the results are
UNPREDICTABLE". Whereas for (v6), the bits are ignored, and as you
say for (v7) the least-significant bit is meaningful.
-- Jamie
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-01 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-29 13:23 [Qemu-devel] Add ARM920T to ARM emulation Vincent Sanders
2009-05-29 13:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Update ARM emulation to be version 4t by default Vincent Sanders
2009-05-29 21:59 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-30 10:08 ` Vincent Sanders
2009-05-29 22:05 ` [Qemu-devel] Add ARM920T to ARM emulation Paul Brook
2009-06-01 11:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-01 12:13 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-01 13:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-01 13:48 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-06-01 13:58 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-01 16:34 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-01 23:11 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090601231115.GC28406@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vince@simtec.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).