From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix gdbstub support for multiple threads in usermode, v2
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:46:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090602204609.GA20952@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906022108.15384.paul@codesourcery.com>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 09:08:14PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> > When debugging multi-threaded programs, QEMU's gdb stub would report the
> > correct number of threads (the qfThreadInfo and qsThreadInfo packets).
> > However, the stub was unable to actually switch between threads (the T
> > packet), since it would report every thread except the first as being
> > dead. Furthermore, the stub relied upon cpu_index as a reliable means
> > of assigning IDs to the threads. This was a bad idea; if you have this
> > sequence of events:
> >
> > initial thread created
> > new thread #1
> > new thread #2
> > thread #1 exits
> > new thread #3
> >
> > thread #3 will have the same cpu_index as thread #1, which would confuse
> > GDB.
>
> Really? Why doesn't GDB get confused on real machines when the PID wraps?
It would, if using gdbserver and no one had done 'info threads' in between.
> Is the real bug that we're missing some sort of thread creation/destruction
> event reporting?
The remote protocol doesn't have creation/destruction events (yet;
it's a known limitation).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-02 19:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix gdbstub support for multiple threads in usermode, v2 Nathan Froyd
2009-06-02 20:08 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-02 20:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2009-06-02 20:54 ` Nathan Froyd
2009-06-02 21:14 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-02 21:48 ` Nathan Froyd
2009-06-02 21:56 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-16 19:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Antti P Miettinen
2009-06-16 19:25 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-16 20:02 ` Antti P Miettinen
2009-06-17 16:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-06-02 22:44 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090602204609.GA20952@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=froydnj@codesourcery.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).